31 Jan

Farm law protests & confusion about democracy

Over two months passed since anti-farm law protests have started. It’s having a major impact across life in Delhi, Haryana and Punjab. This post covers it in detail.

Advanced warning: Very India specific post. Has nothing to do with systems or networks. Do not read if you aren’t interested in Indian farm distress, the way our democracy works and associated issues.

Image source: Firstpost

Background of farming stress

Due to a number of policy decisions, farmers in Punjab and Haryana (and some key areas of UP) got into a vicious cycle of producing wheat & paddy crops in excess. While it was actually a need of the hour when India was in a food crisis decades ago but since the green revolution, it has just continued. A number of expert committees have explored over time to reduce this dependency but lack of political will always come in the way.

Why farmers like growing wheat and paddy in these Northern states:

  • Govt offers so-called “MSP” or Minimum Support Price for these crops. MSP covers these crops but not all crops and while the concept is to offer minimum support but it has practically become maximum price farmers can get. MSP gives the farmer an assurance that they will get money, especially for these crops.

  • Electrically is offered for free to the farmers. This was done after a major protest which happened back in the 80s forcing central govt. to make electricity free for farms and effectively running multiple delivery grid lines for domestic Vs farm consumption in rural areas.

  • Regulation related to groundwater usage is non-existent/not enforced and hence free electricity results in an unlimited free supply of groundwater via tubewell. This report from 2019 covers it briefly.

  • Farmers who have tried other crops have burnt their hands on other crops due to lack of demand/supply sync up and/or understanding of crops and many other reasons primarily related to scale. Indian farming remains technically quite backward by world standards due to lack of investment of technology. This article from Swarajya in 2017 covers it briefly.

Broadly these reasons have resulted in this situation. It’s overall bad because Govt. as of now is procuring way more food grains than needed by the country. Our reserves are soaring to as much as 3-5x of their optimum levels and still Govt. is being forced to procure them due to political compulsions and commitments. A per this Financial Express report from 2019 – FCI spent 1.2 lakh crores / around $14 billion for the excess stock. Despite input subsidy and no income tax, Indian farmer is net taxed due to taxes via other forms like mandi tax of 8.5% (reference).

A large part of excess is just offloaded at throwaway prices and cannot even be exported because it’s just not competitive with international pricing. Plus input subsidy also causes a clash for India at WTO due to its rules (reference).

The excess groundwater used here will result in the desertification of Punjab in the very near future (10-15 years) and that will cause more problems. All this besides the yearly pollution problem of North India due to stubble burning in winters. While Govt. of India procures only 7% of total produce via MSP across India, the number happens to be in majority from Punjab, Haryana and Western UP. That tells how biased system is when seen across the country. And while all that is going on people are often seen on TV channels asking what is the issue with the existing system. Why news laws when farmers do not demand it. That’s a flawed argument as it ignores so many ongoing issues from economic factors to environmental factors.

New farm laws

Govt. introduced three key laws which essentially indirectly deal with the above problems. The key idea about these laws was to remove restrictions of selling produce. So far Indian farmers have been legally forced to sell produce at the local mandi. There is an exception to this based on state laws and their state laws (like some states did allow contract farming). So once these laws are implemented farmers can sell to any mandi or to the private player or get in contract with any entity across India. (Laws are mentioned here on Wikipedia for slightly detailed reading). While these laws do not talk about the removal of the old Mandi system or even MSP but various leaders of farming organisations have been able to project these as bad for the farmers. Govt. intention seems quite clear – they want to bring liberalisation to the agriculture sector by opening it up, allowing private players and removing the dependence on old, inefficient mandi system. It’s important that it will result in the removal of dependence on inefficient mandi system though Govt. as such has not stated that they will just kill MSP or the older system. As a matter of fact, many opposition political parties were in favour of these laws until they were introduced by BJP lead NDA. (Reference article)

Why farmers are protesting

If you look for points made by leaders leading to the farmer protest – they are highly rhetorical and political in nature. But still, one can extract following from their stand:

  • They fear MSP will go away and they would not get guaranteed purchase of their produce. The private sector would dictate prices. This is happening despite Central Govt. has agreed to give an assurance in written not to remove the MSP. An open market with balanced demand and supply is better in long term instead of any artificial controls.

  • They did not like the fact that any dispute between farmers and private corporate has to be resolved in SDM Court instead of regular Civil courts. Govt’s reasoning behind to it was an overload of cases in regular Indian civil courts but again here as well Govt. has backed off and offered to amend the law to allow for raising disputes in the civil court.

  • Farmers feel that the land would be “grabbed” by private corporates. While I did try my best to find what is possibly causing it as per new laws but I cannot find a reason. Nothing in new laws related to that and I think this is nothing more than a fake fear created in farmers mind by people of vested interest. This video where Rakesh Tikait is calling inciting farmers one can see him claiming “ज़मीन नहीं बच रही” – land will not be saved from land grab. (I have put the same video hosted locally with me here just in case if source removes the video at some stage).

  • The assumption that privatisation is just bad and it will just be crony capitalism which will have control on things is simply not true. Indian life has changed dramatically after liberalisation and opening up of the economy in the 90s. Prof Ashok Gulati recently gave the example of Mahindra tractors in one of his interview. They hold a large part of the tractor market. Do we call that Mahindra exploits Indian rural markets or it’s actually a success and is doing great serving the nation? Privatisation will end up in bringing much-needed technology investment and spreading the risk during crop failure.

So all that brought a few lakh (hundred thousand) farmers to the borders of Delhi since December. They had 11 rounds of discussion so far with the Govt. but nothing concluded as they remain adamant on a total pullback by cancelling these laws. Things got more complex as the Supreme court of India is now also involved and has put a stay on implementation of these laws. Furthermore, farmers were just misled by their political leaders and were excited to do a tractor parade on 26th Jan – the Indian Republic Day in New Delhi. That resulted in violence and chaos across Delhi & nearby regions. Many of the protestors went all the way to Red Fort and raised the religious flag over there. There was also a targetted attack on Jio’s mobile towers in Punjab due to conspiracy theories about how Reliance Industries (parent of Jio) has pushed for these laws and is a beneficiary of the new laws.

Confusions about definition of democracy

While the protests have been motivated by the fact that it’s a healthy way of expressing concern in a healthy democracy. But many things make it quite opposite.

  1. Fundamental arguments are very rhetorical and barely have any content. This includes and not limited to slogans & banners saying “We support farmers” while laws have NOTHING to do with supporting or non supporting farmers. Political parties especially Congress & left have been able to push the argument even to International stages where people like Canadian PM are poking their nose in domestic Indian issues and people putting out a march on UK streets in support of farmers without even knowing how the farming economy works in India. Furthermore, Canada has been one raising objection to Indian policies so far at WTO but opposes the change due to its own domestic politics.

  2. This further adds to the street veto mentality in India. People would call laws of a democratically elected Govt. as fascist while street demand with blackmail & violence as something coming from the grassroots. While on the ground there’s not much support for this mentality but news and social media is full of it.
    I remember once how a well-educated friend of mine claimed that “Indian Govt. has failed to handle Covid19 situation and how Govt. should be dismissed and an all-party govt. should take over from here”. I did ask – “All party govt. of whom? People who lost elections against democratically elected members? Is that your definition of democracy?”

    Present NDA Govt. lead by Prime Minister Modi has a majority in Lok Sabha – the lower house of Indian parliament and unlike in the US (where executive & legislature are separate) he has legal control on the legislature (as long as an upper house – Rajya Sabha agrees) and full executive powers. So what they have done so far is totally legal and it’s absurd to call them illegal or undemocratic or authoritarian. My opinion would be the same if it was Congress-led UPA instead of BJP lead NDA in power. Democracy is not about street veto but having trust & faith in govt. elected by the people. While the real number of protestors is unknown, their leaders claim it to be in lakhs. Even if it’s 5 lakh (i.e 500k) it’s just 0.00038% of the population while BJP got 229,076,879 votes (39% of votes casted). To put number is prospective – that is 450 times more people who supported them via a vote even if we believe farm leaders on their numbers. I think it’s probably much lower than 500k because politicians would always inflate numbers.

  3. With due respect to the Supreme Court of India – lately, judicial activism has increased in India. Fundamental understanding of the constitution tells us that job of courts is to ensure laws are applied. But here we have a case where the court has held a bill which is passed by the legislature with parliament majority. I am not legally qualified to say if that’s legal or not but does set the wrong example. Who can we hold accountable for further stress in the agriculture sector? Who will be responsible for not acting on environmental issues due to wheat/paddy excess due to a bad policy framework so far?

  4. While calling supreme court supreme, farmers rejected the Supreme court committee made to look into the farm laws (reference).

  5. While the protest had a hidden political face from day 1 but now it has been openly hijacked by political parties. One of the farm leaders who openly threatened on camera (Rakesh Tikat) is leading protest after 26th Jan incident. He belongs to Jat community and from last 48hrs it becomes an issue of cast politics of Jat dominance Vs Govt. More on this theprint article here. He has been supported by AAP which is elected party in New Delhi, Congress, JJP (part of BJP lead coalition in Haryana), and more. The person was seen openly threatening for violence followed by actual violence on 26th Jan and as a matter, the fact did stand up in election in 2007 & 2014 and lost both of them. Another leader of the protest Yogendra Yadav has fought and lost the election in 2014. He also incited people for 26th Jan incident (video here).
    Still, the moment is claimed to be a non-political moment. This all besides Khalistan supporters actively supporting moment from outside of India.

Long term solution

Broadly this whole thing has two key components – Farm distress and law & order issue. For farming distress, more awareness, campaigning, rebuttal has to be done across masses to ensure they understand what is happening is not sustainable. The country has to get together and turn this wheat & paddy excess into diversified agriculture. An interview of Agricultural economist SS Johl covers it in detail. Some ideas like removing input subsidies like free electricity & other subsidies (which favours Wheat and paddy) and giving direct subsidy on land-area ownership can help. Govt. in Haryana is already trying things like giving subsidy for non-water intensive crops like maize and pulses.

On the question on law and order, India is lacking police reforms. The security forces are under a very tight clutch of the Govt. by means of promotion, transfers and whatnot. It’s not only bad for the country as a whole but also bad for any party which is running the govt. Protestors very much know this and hence any police action of crowd control immediately turns political. This problem has been visible across the last three major incidents in these areas.


In case of Jat reservation riots in 2016 – Protestors blocked routes to Rohtak city for 5-6 days & police could not act. I personally travelled during that illegal block to Auckland, New Zealand for APRICOT 2016. I was planned to go there for Network Security session & left home tensed. Almost cried on mid pause at Hong Kong airport after hearing news about riot situation back home. Govt. did not act and kept showing restraint for political reasons until when the situation got out of control and after a major riot BSF and army had to be called in to impose curfew and control the situation.

During court case on Gurmeet Ram Rahim in 2017, his followers gather in Panchkula for weeks before the hearing date & caused riot as soon as the news came out for his arrest as he was convicted of rape. Again their police did not act because they were not allowed to act due to political compulsions. These political compulsions come because of people who belong to a specific group who support violence as blackmail weapon would not vote if state machinery blocks them but people outside of that group would generally not care. Hence if you act – you loose vote. If you don’t act you don’t loose vote despite chaos on streets, bad law & order situation, massive losses to the public & private property.

Prakash Singh (Retd. DGP, BSF)

Retired DGP Mr Prakash Singh did suggest for some key policy changes to reduce the political clutch for police from executive but so far no Govt. has accepted those. Even after Supreme Court accepted his petition and gave orders to restructure in 2006 – most of state govt. have just not fulfilled those in reality. He once said that “we cannot have a modern developed society with such a politicised police force“. If today police weren’t under the clutches of Govt. they would have acted. Plus Govt. would not have worried that much politically because they wouldn’t be the ones issuing orders to act.

Despite all these problems I do love my country and would love to be in democracy over an authoritative regime. Democracy may have its side effects in short term but always works best in long term.

More awareness has to be spread that long term policy making & following will help us solve our problems and not a mentality of street veto to serve political gains of a few handful people. Besides instability in Delhi, it makes us all worried about instability in Punjab. People from my generation have taken that for granted but that wasn’t the case. This presentation by the ThePrint covers those hard years in detail.

4 thoughts on “Farm law protests & confusion about democracy

  1. I wanted to share my thoughts on your blog. I hope you take the time to read them with an open mind and perhaps even post a reply on which aspects you agree/disagree and correct me if I made some mistakes.

    I completely agree with you that reforms in the agricultural sector are necessary. But agreeing to reforms doesn’t mean agreeing to the 3 laws in the current form. I think many people keep pointing that other political parties had promised reforms and changes to the APMC act. But a bullet point on a manifesto does not mean that they wanted the exact same 3 laws. And the reverse is also true, PM Modi had asked for MSP from PM Manmohan Singh read: https://en.gaonconnection.com/msp-imbroglio-why-is-there-a-tussle-over-legal-sanction-to-minimum-support-price/

    I agree with you that Justin Trudeau’s interference is only because there is a large Sikh voter base in Canada which he wants to retain. I think leaders should be more careful when making comments about other countries and their internal matters. For example, PM Modi saying ‘Ab ki bar Trump sarkar’ could be avoided. But should they completely ignore if something not so good is going on in another country? We are part of the same human race? When a Hindu temple in Pakistan was attacked, many BJP leaders raised their voice: https://twitter.com/BJPLive/status/276231436212785152 and they were correct to do so.

    You mention Rakesh Tikait lost election? so what? does he not have a right to protest? Respected Arun Jaitely lost election and still became Finance minister. It was the right thing. The winning party has to choice to select leaders who lost election. Also our very dear Sambit Patra lost election. Yet he is still BJP spokesperson and appointed as independent director of ONGC. Losing election does not mean people should shut up and stay at there homes. It is like saying if a child fails at school he should give up on education?

    I also agree that it is a law made by a democratically elected government. Yet, the way the bill was passed in the upper house was outrageous. I think the bill would have passed in Rajya Sabha anyway. But don’t you think the members have a right to get their vote counted. Don’t you think people would want to know which member voted for which side.

    Coming to FCI excesses. Yes, we are producing massive amounts of rice and wheat. Yet, India ranks 94 out 107 countries in the world hunger index read: https://indianexpress.com/article/india/global-health-index-2020-india-6757899/ We are with countries like Rwanda, Nigeria, Liberia, Mozambique, Chad.

    Don’t you ever wonder why people are hungry and why doesn’t FCI simply give the excess to the people. This is where I need to explain you how deceptive accounting works: the government shows the FCI food stock as an asset but does not show FCI debt as government debt. read: https://theprint.in/economy/fudge-corp-of-india-how-modi-govt-uses-fci-to-keep-fiscal-deficit-artificially-low/270645/

    The debt of FCI also has grown a lot recently (https://www.nationalheraldindia.com/india/food-corporation-of-indias-debt-increases-three-fold-under-the-five-years-of-the-modi-rule). You would wonder why? Because the government does not allocate enough money for FCI in the budget. So the FCI has no option but to go to banks and take loans (with interest) and a promise to the banks that the government will pay all the interest. But with the economy doing so poorly, the amount that FCI needs to borrow keeps growing.

    You also mention that farmers get free electricity. Yet many many of them commit suicide. Clearly they are not in the best financial position. They also pay 100% taxes on diesel they use. Highest in any country in the world. Ek dum number 1.

    Now coming to privatization. I am one of the firm believers that open markets and competition are healthy. We have many airlines and tickets that are reasonably priced now. Note that it is still not the wild wild west and we have a directorate general of civil aviation (DGCA) that oversees the private airlines to ensure they don’t completely screw common people.

    But privatizing everything is bad. Let me explain that with a couple of examples. I think we all agree that our current justice system is very slow and overloaded. Shouldn’t we privative it and have private judges and courts? I think you would say no.

    How about privatizing prisons? Thankfully, we already know what happens if you privatize prisons. Unites States has private prisons and there is clear information to show how the number of people being sent to prison and the duration of sentences have been increasing to keep the private prisons very profitable: https://news.wsu.edu/2020/09/15/privatized-prisons-lead-inmates-longer-sentences-study-finds/

    Contract farming only works with very very large farm ownership. But in India, the average size of farm ownership is very very small. In Haryana and other parts of UP and Uttrakhand, people marry one woman to all the sons and only the elder son is allowed to make kids? This is to prevent the farmland from splitting. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2295380/The-wife-married-FIVE-brothers-Rajo-21-follows-tradition-Indian-villages-allows-families-hold-farmland.html

    If you want some comedy, see this show on contract egg farming: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9wHzt6gBgI

    Finally about blocking roads. I understand that people are inconvenienced. And blocking of roads/trains is not nice. But there is also the fact that protesting in some remote corner of India will not make people in the government listen. No government anywhere in the world likes protests and wants them to go away. A good compromise here would be a location where protesters can raise a voice and be noticed by people while not blocking roads. The farmers had asked for Jantar Mantar as a protest site. But they were denied.

    • Hello Jai

      That was a nice and detailed comment. Please find my reply below where desired and where we both have a difference in opinion.

      You mention Rakesh Tikait lost election? so what? does he not have a right to protest? Respected Arun Jaitely lost the election and still became Finance minister.

      I did not say that he has no right to protest. Everyone has the right to protest but when the same set of people i.e Tikait & his supporters call govt. authoritarian then it’s quite wrong. You cannot call democratically elected govt. authoritarian especially when they have made laws which they are supported by members of the legislature.
      The whole point of Tikait & Yogendra Yadav losing election comes up when they project themselves as true leaders and voice of masses.

      Your point about people losing the election and still becoming a minister like Arun Jaitely is true and valid. I would not question that case or call it illegal simply because whether it was Arun Jaitley or even Dr Manmohan Singh – they got elected in Rajya Sabha based on pre-defined norms and in a way got elected indirectly by the people of India.
      It’s not that different from saying the appointment of President or Vice-President of India. One can question whether the system is overall correct or not but whatever the system is – it was followed and there was no case of dispute/illegality in their appointment.
      This again makes me repeat – everyone has the right to protest, discuss, debate. No wise person would question it. What I am questioning here is – How people like Tikait / Yogendra Yadav are establishing that they are the leader of masses when a system defined in our constitution (i.e elections) says otherwise.
      Plus how the moment is non-political when people who clearly have political ambition are leading it and even sharing the stage with politicians?

      I also agree that it is a law made by a democratically elected government. Yet, the way the bill was passed in the upper house was outrageous. I think the bill would have passed in Rajya Sabha anyway. But don’t you think the members have a right to get their vote counted. Don’t you think people would want to know which member voted for which side.

      That’s a valid point and we need more reforms to make bill making process more clear. I don’t have a disagreement here except that please do keep in context that a large number of bills have been passed with similar rules.
      The 1990 reform wasn’t widely discussed in a similar manner and using same logic one can call that it was “imposed” but that’s more of Govt. skill in handling these reforms. If you have a problem with overall way bills are discussed (all bill, not just farm bills) then I am total aggrement with you. I would hope for more transparency on that as well but I would not single out farm bills for that.

      Don’t you ever wonder why people are hungry and why doesn’t FCI simply give the excess to the people.

      I think (to best of my knowledge) it has to do with how many parts of budget Govt. is allocating for schemes like PDS. Ideally, it has to be an amount that people are fed but that’s ideal. You hit harsh realities of the deficit on every account and hence corners are cut. Budget for schemes like PDS have a great impact & can improve it but education, defence, infra sectors are equally important as well. And hence goes the act of balancing.
      This reminds of UPA time where once Planning Commission defined a specific number (can’t remember exact one but I guess it was like 50-70Rs a day) and the argument was that anyone making more than that is not below the poverty line. Media immediately jumped in to prove how bad that number was and reports came around media folks going to dhabbas and finding the cost of meal & proving that Planning commission’s definition was wrong. Eventually, Mr Montek Singh Ahluwalia (heard of planning commission) appeared and explained that there are poor people, and there are very poor people. As soon as you make bar higher, you end up in distributing the same (limited) resources between poor & very poor and very poor come on losing side due to that.

      Thus “what if Govt. squeezes some money from saying infra/defence/education and procures more wheat/rice and reduces hunger” – that might work in short term but beyond a point, it may not give you good result. The only known best thing which pulls people out of poverty is more economic growth.

      You also mention that farmers get free electricity. Yet many many of them commit suicide. Clearly they are not in the best financial position. They also pay 100% taxes on diesel they use. Highest in any country in the world. Ek dum number 1.

      You probably missed my point. I said in the article that despite these input subsidies farmer is net-taxed in India. The input subsidies just break the market rules of demand & supply besides adding to inefficiency where things like say water/electricity is wasted a lot since incentives are aligned that way. Whether you use it or not, it’s just free. Instead of that if fixed amount say x Rs/acre is given, people will do their best to make the best use of that “x”. Regarding 100% tax on diesel – well farmers pay the same amount for diesel as rest of country pays. When diesel was subsidised, there was enough misuse of that subsidy by rich middle/upper-middle class in their SUVs. Administratively you cannot separate diesel given to farmers Vs rest of people and hence the same pricing makes sense. Instead of focusing on differential pricing and differential treatment we should focus on increasing efficiency. I totally agree that every country is subsiding the agriculture sector and we have to do the same as well. Just that I disagree on the present way of doing it by the method of input cost.

      But privatizing everything is bad. Let me explain that with a couple of examples. I think we all agree that our current justice system is very slow and overloaded.

      Agreed that privatising everything is not a good idea but there are a lot of things where it’s a good idea. There’s a good reason for that. Take an example from my industry (internet & telecom). Public sector players like BSNL cannot complete simply because they have a long & slow system for procuring hardware as well as talent. Everything including office stationery has to be purchased via tenders compared to how dynamic private players are. Those requirements of tendering to save from massive corruption but make the system slow. If you remove that system may work faster but then you will be inviting massive corruption. So things like telecom, airports, bus stands, buses, National Highway roads and many more are the sectors where it does makes sense to involve the private sector. I am aware of the prison case from the US and it was simply a case where incentives were aligned in the wrong manner. I remember watching it in dramatic show Billions & later realising from the news that it was actually what happened in reality.

      Finally about blocking roads. I understand that people are inconvenienced. And blocking of roads/trains is not nice. But there is also the fact that protesting in some remote corner of India will not make people in the government listen.

      The negative impact protestors have on Govt. is not that much from blocking of roads. It’s way more for common people. Furthermore blocking of major National highways for months, openly threatening by giving a call of tractor rally & then actually doing it. Challenging police to stop it and later questioning police for not acting – all that shows full cheap political drama instead of being sensitive about country, democracy and people. My personal opinion here is that moment has lost any sympathy after 26th Jan. Have seen quite a few major protests turning into riots in recent times and all seem to have same ingredients.

      Thanks for taking time for this detailed comment & message. Appreciate it and I will read more about FCI debt.

      • I am one of the believers who thinks any law can be fixed. But I also understand that many farmers have lost faith and trust in the government and won’t settle for anything less than repeal of the laws. I am sad that my government did not fix this problem and now foreign entities are tweeting about it.

        Your example of privatization is well-taken. I had written in my first comment, that with good state supervision, I am a big fan of healthy market competition and support privatization of banks, railways etc. I have worked on contractual basis for the central government and I know how slow processes they have. Even in 2019, we were printing emails and archiving them in files. But I think giving successful example of of privatization in one sector does not mean it apply to another sector. I can actually give you an example from agriculture on how privatization can ruin farmers. Cocoa farmers for years have been suffering thanks to big private players like Nestle. Cocoa farmers in Ghana and Ivory cost grow60% of the world’s cocoa but are living in extreme poverty. https://www.myjoyonline.com/the-cry-of-suffering-cocoa-farmers-pay-us-higher-prices-or-we-will-die/

        Now your point about Tikait and Yogendra yadav loosing elections. Well I personally dislike Yogendra Yadav myself. I mean I like he is soft spoken but I don’t like him inserting himself in every protest and issue.

        Still, I don’t think leadership is decided simply by elections. I for example did not vote for Modi and BJP. Not because I don’t like them. But because they have no or minimal presence in the state where I live. Does that mean he is not my leader. Absolutely not. He is still my Prime Minister. I would have voted for them because I am supporter of market liberalization. My point is that farmers decide who discusses with the govt, If they are satisfied with Tikait and Yadav as leaders, then that is their choice.

Leave a Reply to warlord77 Cancel reply

%d bloggers like this: