Tata – Airtel domestic peering IRR filtering and OpenDNS latency!
Last month I noticed quite high latency with Cisco’s OpenDNS from my home fibre connection. The provider at home is IAXN (AS134316) which is peering with content folks in Delhi besides transit from Airtel.
ping -c 5 208.67.222.222
PING 208.67.222.222 (208.67.222.222) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=51 time=103 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=51 time=103 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=51 time=103 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=4 ttl=51 time=103 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=5 ttl=51 time=103 ms
--- 208.67.222.222 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 received, 0% packet loss, time 4005ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 103.377/103.593/103.992/0.418 msThis is
Here’s how forward trace looked like
traceroute 208.67.222.222
traceroute to 208.67.222.222 (208.67.222.222), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 172.16.0.1 (172.16.0.1) 0.730 ms 0.692 ms 0.809 ms
2 axntech-dynamic-218.140.201.103.axntechnologies.in (103.201.140.218) 4.904 ms 4.314 ms 4.731 ms
3 10.10.26.1 (10.10.26.1) 6.000 ms 6.414 ms 6.326 ms
4 10.10.26.9 (10.10.26.9) 6.836 ms 7.135 ms 7.047 ms
5 nsg-static-77.249.75.182-airtel.com (182.75.249.77) 9.344 ms 9.416 ms 9.330 ms
6 182.79.243.201 (182.79.243.201) 62.274 ms 182.79.177.69 (182.79.177.69) 66.874 ms 182.79.239.193 (182.79.239.193) 61.297 ms
7 121.240.1.201 (121.240.1.201) 85.789 ms 82.250 ms 79.591 ms
8 172.25.81.134 (172.25.81.134) 110.049 ms 172.31.29.245 (172.31.29.245) 114.350 ms 113.673 ms
9 172.31.133.210 (172.31.133.210) 112.598 ms 172.19.138.86 (172.19.138.86) 114.889 ms 172.31.133.210 (172.31.133.210) 113.415 ms
10 115.110.234.50.static.mumbai.vsnl.net.in (115.110.234.50) 125.770 ms 125.056 ms 123.779 ms
11 resolver1.opendns.com (208.67.222.222) 113.648 ms 115.044 ms 106.066 msForward trace looks fine except that latency jumps as soon as we hit Tata AS4755 backbone. OpenDNS connects with Tata AS4755 inside India and announces their anycast prefixes to them. If the forward trace is logically correct but has high latency, it often reflects the case of
Here’s what Tata AS4755 Mumbai router had for IAXN prefix:
BGP routing table entry for 14.102.188.0/22
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Not advertised to any peer
6453 9498 134316 134316 134316 134316 134316 134316 134316 134316 134316 134316
192.168.203.194 from 192.168.199.193 (192.168.203.194)
Origin IGP, localpref 62, valid, internal, best
Community: 4755:44 4755:97 4755:888 4755:2000 4755:3000 4755:47552 6453:50 6453:3000 6453:3400 6453:3402
Originator: 192.168.203.194, Cluster list: 192.168.199.193 192.168.194.15
Last update: Mon Mar 25 15:26:36 2019Thus what was happening is this:
Forward path: IAXN (AS134316) > Airtel (AS9498) > Tata (AS4755) > OpenDNS (AS36692)
Return path: OpenDNS (AS36692) > Tata (AS4755) > Tata (AS6453) > Airtel (AS9498) > IAXN (AS134316)
While this may seem like a Tata – Airtel routing issue but it wasn’t. I could see some of the prefixes with a
traceroute to 103.87.46.1 (103.87.46.1), 15 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 * * *
2 172.31.170.210 (172.31.170.210) 0.911 ms 0.968 ms 0.643 ms
3 172.23.78.233 (172.23.78.233) 1.233 ms 0.821 ms 0.810 ms
4 172.17.125.249 (172.17.125.249) 23.540 ms 23.454 ms 23.367 ms
5 115.110.232.174.static.Delhi.vsnl.net.in (115.110.232.174) 49.175 ms 48.832 ms 49.107 ms
6 182.79.153.87 (182.79.153.87) 48.777 ms 182.79.153.83 (182.79.153.83) 49.043 ms 182.79.177.127 (182.79.177.127) 54.879 ms
7 103.87.46.1 (103.87.46.1) 60.865 ms 60.540 ms 60.644 ms
This clearly was fine. So why Tata was treating 103.87.46.0/24 different from 14.102.188.0/22? The reason for that lies in following:
- Airtel (AS9498) very likely peers with Tata (AS4755). They do interconnect for sure as we see in traceroutes and my understanding is that it’s based on settlement-free peering for Indian traffic.
- Airtel (AS9498) buys IP transit from Tata (AS6453) (besides a few others). Tata AS6453 is carrying the routing announcements to other networks in the transit free zone and that confirms that Airtel (at least technically) has a downstream customer relationship here.
- Tata (AS4755) has IRR based filters on peering but not the Tata (AS6453) for it’s downstream. Hence while Tata rejected the route in India, they did accept that in Singapore PoP.
- My IP was from prefix 14.102.188.0/22 and there was no valid route object for it at any of key IRRs like ATLDB, APNIC or RADB. But other prefix 103.87.46.0/24 did had a valid route object on APNIC.
Now after almost 10 days of it, my ISP has changed the BGP announcement and announcing 14.102.189.0/24 (which does a valid route object on APNIC). This fixes the routing problem and give me pretty decent latency with OpenDNS:
ping -c 5 208.67.222.222
PING 208.67.222.222 (208.67.222.222): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=0 ttl=55 time=52.552 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=1 ttl=55 time=53.835 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=2 ttl=55 time=53.330 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=3 ttl=55 time=52.700 ms
64 bytes from 208.67.222.222: icmp_seq=4 ttl=55 time=52.504 ms
--- 208.67.222.222 ping statistics ---
5 packets transmitted, 5 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 52.504/52.984/53.835/0.518 msSo if you are a network operator and originating prefixes, please do document them in any of the IRRs. You can do that via IRR of your RIR (APNIC, ARIN etc) or a free IRR like ALTDB. If you have
Misc Notes
- Posted strictly in my personal capacity and has nothing to do with my employrer.
- Thanks for folks from Cisco/OpenDNS for quick replies with relevant data which helped in troubleshooting. 🙂